Evaluation Tools

Evaluation tools to help you out

Knowing when to pivot

By Lindsay Lamb

Recently, I was in a meeting with a client presenting data from a quick survey check in. We were reviewing the data visualizations I made based on some earlier feedback. Sometimes when I share survey data, I collapse categories to show an overall level of agreement, or to indicate the overall percentage of favorable responses.

Since we were examining responses from students who were engaging in a virtual internship in the middle of a pandemic, we figured most responses would generate a negatively skewed distribution (see graph below, and if you’re interested in learning more about skewness, read this!).

A negatively skewed distribution (meaning most responses are positive, or favorable)

Indeed, preliminary examinations of the data suggested that students’ responses were skewed such that there were few responses at the low end of the scale on our various survey questions (e.g., disagree, strongly disagree, not at all likely, etc.). We decided to examine movement in students’ responses at the top end of the distribution (e.g., strongly agree, agree, extremely likely). Based on this decision, I crated a visualization only showing the most favorable responses (presenting only the percentage of strongly agree or extremely likely responses, for example).

So, back tot the meeting.

All was going well. We were having a lively discussion of the data I presented in my one-pager when the client made a casual comment about being bummed about some of the responses. They had spent so much time pivoting their instructional material to be engaging in this new virtual environment, and only a third of responses indicated students felt the lessons were extremely interesting.

Slightly over a third of students’ found the lessons extremely interesting, just over half found the lessons or extremely relevant to their lives.

Ugh. My heart sank.

Fortunately, I knew there was more to the data. I pivoted. I had the data up in an interactive dashboard and shared my screen with our client. I recomputed responses to include extremely interesting and interesting.

“Actually, nearly all of your participants were interested in the lessons and found them relevant!”

Pivoting and recomputing the responses told our client a more positive story.

Sure, a little over a third found the lessons extremely interesting, but the bigger story is that most students were engaged and found the content relevant to their lives. This was huge! Our client had pivoted their entire learning platform to a virtual environment, and students were engaged.

What did I learn?

  • Sometimes it makes sense to have a plan, but you need to adapt. We are program evaluators and there isn’t something that we love more than a good evaluation plan (except maybe a logic model!). Sometimes we can get rigid and only want to look at the data in a specific way, thinking that we will know what the data will tell us. Sometimes, however, we need to let the data tell its own story.
  • Don’t be afraid to pivot. Recomputing the data not only showed our agility as researchers and consultants, but also helped our client see their data in a new way. It helped our client see the value of their work and trust us in our services.
  • The power of one-pagers. Having a one-pager with data visualizations and short text explanations helped our client easily see the data and understand the story. It also helped us recognize where we needed to go in our analysis. Having the data in a digestible way facilitated our conversation and helped us see where we needed to go. It was empowering for me and empowering for our client.
  • Have your data handy. In addition to having a user-friendly one-pager, having the data accessible in a sharable format helped us see where we needed to go in our analyses. It was empowering for me and empowering for our client.

The one-pager’s sidekick, the sidebar!

by Lindsay Lamb

Something that I have often struggled with in producing a succinct and powerful one-pager is where to put technical information, a brief description of data used in the study, analyses conducted in the study, study design, survey questions, etc.

In a typical research paper, that information is generally presented first. Most of us come from an academic background, where we learned to write reports with Introduction, then Methods, then Results (which oftentimes are full of technicalities), then, finally the Conclusion – where the actual findings and interpretation lie.

The problem? It’s BOOOOORING. You’ll lose all but the most dedicated reader with reports that are designed that way, and in a one pager, it’s a killer. The conclusions need to be front and center.

But what about that technical info about how the study works?

Sidebar to the rescue

This is where the sidebar comes in. You still need to be succinct, but it is a way to break up the layout of your one-pager and go more deeply into a specific topic that is essential to your one-pager but does not need to be part of the overall one-pager narrative.

Here is the template we’ve shared with you in the past:

An overview of our one-pager template.

Still not sure what to use a side bar for? The sidebar can also include photos, data visualizations, description of program elements, survey questions, survey response rates, quotes from participants, anything that your audience should know, but can stand alone in its own section. Here are just a couple of examples:

Here are a couple of examples of sidebars we have used in recent reports.
Here is another sidebar example using data visualizations.

Here are some key takeaways to help you become the master of the sidebar:

  1. Put information that is necessary to understand your report in the sidebar.
  2. Add icons, photos, or a data visualization that will break up the layout of your report.
  3. Keep it simple! Details belong in the report (or the appendix!)

Create a One Pager In One Hour

by Lindsay Lamb

Have you ever been in a situation where someone needs a one-pager – like yesterday? You’re just sitting at your desk, and all of a sudden, your boss comes by and says, “Hey Lindsay, the superintendent [program manager, director, business analyst] needs a one-pager on that research [analysis, presentation, etc.] you’ve been working on. Can you get it to me in two hours?”

Internally, if you’re anything like me, you’re probably thinking: “AHHHHHH!!! HOW AM I GOING TO DO THIS??? THIS IS CRAZY!!!”

Externally, you remained poised and self-confident : “Of course, I’m happy to help!”

So, what can you do to make this happen? Take a deep breath and follow these simple steps.

  1. Use what you’ve got. Before you get started, do you have a longer report, outline, or presentation? If yes, then this process just got A LOT easier. If not, don’t worry, I’m sure much of that information exists in your head. Go ahead and sketch out a rough outline either using word or on paper – whatever you need to do to get those creative juices flowing.
  2. Use One-Pager Building Blocks: Now that you have a rough idea of what you want to say, use these four building blocks to help you get started building your report:
Use these building blocks to design your one-pager. You can even use them to segment the page (or pages as a one-pager can be two-pages front and back).

If you have a larger report, presentation, or outline, what are the main headings and/or major findings? Do you already have a description of the study? Trim that down and drop it in at the beginning or in the sidebar. If not, quickly jot down the things from your report/presentation/analysis that stand out to you. Whittle them down to the top four ideas and rank them so you know which one to add depending on how much space you have in your document. Keep in mind that when you create your report, you want to include as much white space as possible to make it easier for your audience to read you report. Don’t muddle it with too much information.

Now that you have a better idea of what you want to say, it’s time to start thinking about the layout. As a general rule, a one-pager can be broken down into three or four major sections per page: The introduction, a major finding, a visualization and a photo. Sidebars are a great way to visually break up the page and add some of this information. Here is a generic template that can give you a rough idea of what your one-pager might look like.

Here are the building blocks of a one-pager using our generic template. Remember, your one-pager can be two pages (one-page front and back):

Here’s a snapshot of our generic template. There are three sections represented here comprised of finding 1, finding 2, and a sidebar.
  1. Have you created data visualizations? Can you use those? Can you combine visualizations (small multiples, maybe)? If not, think of ways to create data visualizations quickly. Most people respond well to percentages and simple figures. If time permits, create a visualization using that type of information. Remember, as an evaluator, you most likely won’t be the one sharing the information from this report, so it is important to ensure the data visualization can stand on its own without a lot of explanation. Don’t have time to create a visualization? Use icons or photos to break up the text and add something visually appealing for your reader.
  2. Summarize key takeaways. What do you want you audience to remember? Are there important strategies they need to consider? Program elements that should be removed? Funding sources that should be added or eliminated? Share them, and preferably using bullets 😉

Whew. That was quick, but I hope you have found it useful. If, like me, you find yourself in tis situation, remember to use the following strategies to help you create a one-pager in just a couple of hours:

  1. Identify the major findings
  2. Break up the page into three or four sections. Use a sidebar to include additional information relevant to your analysis such as a description of the study, data used, research questions, project timeline, etc.
  3. Create effective and efficient data visualizations that correspond with your major findings. Don’t have time for visualizations? That’s okay, you can use icons or photos.
  4. Highlight the key takeaways from your analysis. What do people need to know to make informed decisions?

That’s it!

Want to learn more? Our upcoming mini-course will take you deeper into creating an effective one-pager – stay tuned!

Brand Your Documents in Three Easy Steps

by Lindsay Lamb

We have talked a lot recently about tools for your evaluator’s toolbox. Today I have another essential tool to for you: consistent branding. Clear and consistent branding can help you more quickly and efficiently create short and long reports. Doing so will ensure that when people look at a report, they will instantly know that it came from you. I have found that consistent branding takes some of the guess work out of report writing. I no longer have to think through color choices, layout, font, or headers. That leg work has already been completed. I’m guessing you have a little free time now, so you might as well spend some time thinking through your branding. Trust me, you will thank me later.

Enough of my pep talk.

I’m sure you are wondering how to create a clean, consistent look for your reports, one-pagers, and blogs. Follow these three simple steps:

Logo

Make sure you have a unique logo that lets people know what your business/firm/program is about.

You can use a logo generator to help you out! We used logogenie.net.

Colors

If you have a logo, use colors from your logo in your reports.

Remember the color wheel? Use it! Make sure you incorporate complimentary colors (colors on opposite side of the arrows), and colors in a shade that is easy to see on screen, in print, and for those with color blindness. A good test for any report is to print it out in black and white. If your colors are all grey, try using gradations within the same color to convey meaning.

A color wheel, complimentary colors are located diagonally across from each other.

Use colors consistently such that all headers are the same color, etc.

Caveat – if you are generating a report for a client with clear branding, you might want to use their branding and simply insert your logo. Check with program staff, your supervisor, a colleague, a friend, or even reach out to us if you have questions and want some feedback!

Here is our style guide, and a link to the logo generator we used.

Font/layout

Choose a font that is unique and easy to read

Stephanie Evergreen goes into great detail on the importance of choosing fonts in her book, Presenting Data Effectively.

You can select two fonts, or fonts that are bold and light to use to signal to the reader level of importance. There are a plethora of fonts out there, download something unique online.

The layout of your reports should also be consistent. Check out our recent blog post on one-pagers. The idea is that people should pick up a report and instantly know that it came from your organization/consulting firm.

Our typical layout scheme.

One final tip – try out your branding! If you have a few ideas, try them out and see what your clients, friends, colleagues think. Send your ideas to us and we will look them over. Your brand is the first thing that people will see when experiencing a report you have created, so you want to make sure it is right.

The Secret Reason Leaders Aren’t Reading Your Evaluation Reports

by Andrea Hutson

Evaluators: be honest: have you ever worked hard on an evaluation, found some really exciting findings, wrote an amazing report, and turned it in expecting….

  • praise from program leadership!
  • noticeable, positive program changes!
  • maybe a promotion? (or extended contract?)

And instead, got… crickets?

Let me raise my hand the highest. It’s definitely happened to me, and one time in particular is burned into my mind.


I was in a final report meeting with a large agency. The evaluation we were reporting on was a multi-year, multi-site evaluation with mixed methods, requiring multiple staff, travel, a ton of time with SPSS and R, and a very long time writing and editing the report.

There were about 10 people in the that final meeting, including the relatively new program director (sidenote: one interesting thing about long evaluations – in some organizations, change is so constant that often the only people who are with the program from start to finish are the evaluators).

Our final report was over 100 pages, with appendices, and lots of technical detail.

After I presented all of the results from the study, the program director looked at me and smiled. “Wow! These are really interesting results!” I smiled back.

“But…”, she started… and I felt my heart sink.

Then she dropped a bomb.

“But, you know no one will ever read this.”

Oh my goodness, so painful to hear – but I knew she was right.

It’s not that the content was bad (of course it wasn’t! I wrote it!), it’s just that it was too dang long.

Decision makers don’t have time to read.

The average 30-page evaluation report takes about an hour to carefully read and process (and at over 100 pages, my report would have taken 3+ hours)

The problem is, leaders – especially the higher you get up the food chain – don’t have an hour. 

There was a fantastic study of CEOs conducted in 2018 by the Harvard Business Review (https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-leaders-calendar) that explains why. (Although the report only looked at CEOs from the business world, non-profit and governmental leadership likely have very similar constraints.)

According to the study, CEOs spend the vast majority of their time (about 72%) in meetings, either with their own staff, leadership, or clients. They have very little time alone, and most of that time is in small chunks (i.e., not conducive to report reading).

Check out this time graph of one CEO’s alone time, arranged in 15 minute green blocks.

chart of ceo's time arranged in blocks
This CEO has very little time to himself. Source: https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-leaders-calendar

Even when we include Saturday and Sunday, this CEO only had 8 hours of one-hour or more alone time for the entire week, even though he was working a TON of hours (note that he starts working before 6 AM most days).

The study noted that the CEO spent the majority of that alone time (55%) reading and responding to emails. After we remove that time, he had only had about 3 or so hour-long chunks for all other unscheduled tasks.  FOR THE WEEK.

And that’s the reason that long reports don’t get widely read.

There’s just no time!

What can you do?

Now beyond going past the existential crisis about why we write reports at all, there are a few solutions. Here are three ways you can maximize your impact.

  1. Don’t write a report; make a presentation instead. This method is getting more popular over time; UX Evaluators typically present results in one final PowerPoint. If you noticed above, we added on a presentation, which was the product that got us traction with the program leadership. That’s also a possibility, if a report is absolutely required (although the product we had worked for hundreds of hours on became essentially a doorstop).
  2. Write a brief report instead of a long one. We’ve had tremendous success with 4 or 5 page evaluation briefs. When carefully written, these briefs can include the vast majority of findings, details, and recommendations that people need, in a format that’s digestible and a relatively quick read.
  3. Add on a powerful one-pager. One pagers delete all but the most essential content, giving just the highest level findings from a study. The best thing about one-pagers is that they can be added on to a brief report, or even a very long one. Stephanie Evergreen has a great post on the 1-3-25 model, (https://stephanieevergreen.com/the-1-3-25-reporting-model/) in which a one-pager is tacked on to an evaluation brief which is tacked on to a longer report (but notice: the ‘longer report’ is only 25 pages).

Want to learn more about option 3?

Lindsay and I are currently working on a course on one-pagers that’s designed for anyone who wants to make more of an impact with their reports. This course will provide easy steps to turn a long report into a one page document that engages readers and packs a punch. And you’ll do it without needing graphic design skills or any fancy software. We’ll be sharing some of it on the blog, but if you’d like to be notified when the course goes live. subscribe below.



The 24-Hour Evaluation

When visiting with organizations about the importance of evaluating their programs, we generally see a lot of enthusiasm. Nonprofits, school districts, and others realize that evaluations:

  • Let organizations know what’s working and what’s not
  • Give stakeholders a way to provide valuable feedback
  • Can give a sense of the impact the program is making
  • Save time and money in the long run

Why then, aren’t organizations doing evaluations for EVERY program, EVERY time?

Two things are missing – time & money. Evaluations are often perceived as (and can be) massive behemoths that take hours and hours to conduct and cost quite a bit of money.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

We have recently been working on a method to produce a comprehensive, focused evaluation with a polished final report or professional presentation in just 24 hours.

Of course, you could spend the longest day ever on the evaluation and get (some types) done in one day. But you could also spread those hours out and get a high quality evaluation completed in a week, with 4-6 hours of work a day.

The 24 hour evaluation has 3 phases.

  1. Phase One: Planning (4 h, Day 1).  In this phase, you’ll brainstorm ideas for your evaluation, create a mini-theory of change, select your evaluation questions, and decide on your strategy for data collection.
  2. Phase Two: Data Collection & Analysis (12 h, Days 2 & 3).  In the next phase, you’ll collect data (whether new or existing), clean it up, and analyze it.  This is the longest phase, for obvious reasons, and if you choose to collect new data, it will necessarily take longer than one 24-hour day to complete the process.
  3. Phase Three: Reporting (8 h, Days 4 & 5). In the final phase, you’ll pick a report type (either an evaluation brief or a presentation), write your content, edit, and publish or present.

A few caveats:

  • The number of evaluation questions asked will be small and targeted. This may look like one deep question or several small questions.
  • If you are planning on writing a report, the report will be a brief report of 5 pages with an additional one-pager summary. There’s not time to write a 30 page report in 24 hours! An evaluation brief, when written carefully, can actually be more effective than a long report because people are more likely to actually pick it up and read it.
  • If you are planning to do interviews and focus groups, you will use a rapid analysis method – no time to transcribe tapes and upload themes into nVivo or some other analysis software. Instead, you’ll be pulling out the big and consistent messages that you’ve heard.

With this method, 90% of what your organization needs to do to make real, meaningful change could be done in one work week spread over 24 hours.


Ready to get started?

Fill out the form below to get the 24-hour evaluation schedule for FREE.

We absolutely 100% pinky swear never ever to send you spam.


Making Over the One Pager

By Lindsay Lamb and Andrea Hutson

We are going to be talking a lot in the next few weeks about the wonderful tool in your evaluator’s toolbox called the One Pager.

One Pagers have all sorts of uses, and can help you get funding, pitch an idea, or share high level results with board members or executives.

To be effective, they need to grab your readers’ attention and give them just the right amount of information to make them want to know more.

This is more difficult than it sounds.

TMI

One of the biggest traps you can fall into with a one pager is putting too much information on the page.

Check out this example. Sure it is a one-pager, but can you easily see and read what is going on?

A one-pager on Covid-19 created by a Seattle internist.

To be fair, I’m sure the doctor who created this was in a fit of anxiety, and desperately wanted to get all of this information out to others to help save the world… but it is safe to say that this is a bit much.

How about this one? It’s actually pretty good. We’re definitely going in the right direction.

A one-pager designed to promote a business and win over investors.

Things I like about this one-pager:

  1. Three columns that break up the text,
  2. Consistent color, headers, and branding, and
  3. Cool infographics

Things that could be improved:

  1. It is too busy
  2. There is redundant and unnecessary information
  3. The story gets lost; you really have to jump around the narrative to determine the key takeaways

Makeover Time!

Here’s the makeover.

This one-pager contains the same information as the one above, but:

  • There’s an image that gives you an idea of what the product is right in the center.
  • There is more white space, drawing the reader in so that they can more easily make sense of the data in front of them.
  • It states the key facts from the beginning and moves some of the background information to a sidebar.
  • It tells a story. Note that the flow goes from Problem to Solution.
  • It keeps the branding of the organization but adds a bit of color.

It’s still not perfect. This is probably something we’d submit to a client as a draft, noodle over for awhile, and then revise.

Tips for Effective One Pagers

How do you create effective one-pagers? Follow these simple guidelines:

  1. Keep it simple! Ensuring you have a lot of white space will highlight what you actually want your audience to read.
  2. Break up your one-pager into sections. I try to use three sections per page (a one-pager can be two pages with a front and back). Use a sidebar, pull quotes, and icons to help break things up.
  3. Use visualizations. Create simple figures or charts, use icons, use bold font and color to highlight key findings.

Ready to build your own on one-pager? We will be launching a mini-course that will walk you through the steps to create a simple, and effective one-pager soon. Stay tuned!

Thinking inside the box: Use a table to insert a figure, chart, or image in Word

By: Lindsay Lamb

Have you ever gotten frustrated adding an image into your report, especially in word? The text boxes don’t line up quite right, images jump around, things get anchored in a weird place, you can’t resize anything… and you want to throw your computer against the wall. Well, maybe that’s just me.

Although I have been writing reports for nearly a decade, it was only recently that I learned this cool trick that would have saved me lots of grief and frustration.

Recently, Andrea and I were working in tandem on a report. We each took a section, set a timer to draft it out, and got busy. I was in the zone. Chugging away, racing to get as much done as I possibly could before the timer went off. I decided not to get bogged down in adding figures, it was just too frustrating for me to add them in word. Instead, I created a couple of figures in excel, and added placeholders for them in word. I would deal with them later. I glanced over at what Andrea was doing. Cool and confident, Andrea was two pages in AND HAD FIGURES!!! She saw my eyes widen and said,

“Hey, have I ever shown you this cool way to add figures in Word?”

“No…”

“You just add a three-row table in word and drop the figure in. Make the top row the title, the middle row the image, and the bottom row for the note or source.”

My jaw dropped.

GENIUS!!!

Here is a step-by-step process for inserting a figure in word (or PowerPoint) using a table.

STEP 1: Insert a 3-row table

(Insert->Table)

Three-row table

Note: You can add columns if you are inserting a series of figures that all have the same title; the columns can be the same width and the rows can be the same height, ensuring that your figures are all the same size.

STEP 2: Drop in your figure, add your title, and your source/note.

Place the figure in the second row, the caption in the top row, and the note in the bottom row.

Image inserted into word using a three-row table.

I just copy and pasted my figure from excel into word. I can easily make changes to the figure in excel and it will update in word. I can also make minor edits to the figure in word (like color or font) as well.

Now these three elements – title, figure, and note – are all grouped together. You can change the size of the figure as one unit, move the figure around without throwing off anchoring. Text in the remainder of the report can wrap around the figure in multiple ways, depending on the report layout.

Wait! Before you move on to your next figure, there is one final step. Obviously, you do not want the table borders to show up, but it is helpful to see the borders while you are laying out your report and copy editing. Let’s get rid of them.

STEP 3: Make the table border invisible for the final report, but visible while editing.

Select table, then right click and choose “No Border”

Now you’re done!

Here’s the final result:

Final result with borders only visible while editing.

A similar process exists in Microsoft publisher, but that software is not available on a Mac, and since many of us are working from home, we might not have access to our regular office setup. Also, sometimes, you just need to use word because not everyone has publisher.

In any case, if you are using publisher, you can insert an image placeholder and add text boxes for the title and note/source and then group those elements together. The difficulty with that process, however, is that you have to resize the figure in excel prior to inserting it into publisher or your figure might get wonky. Translation: you need to know the overall layout of your report so that you know how much space you have for your image prior to inserting it into your document. In word, the image resizes appropriately with the rest of the elements in the table.

Hope this trick helps you as much as it helped me!

Extreme Data Viz Makeover: COVID Edition

by Lindsay Lamb

Andrea and I have mentioned it before: we are in a golden age, albeit a morbid golden age, of data and data visualizations. One way we can stay ahead of Covid-19 is by reading the reports and analyses that are readily available to the public. Sometimes this information can be super helpful, and sometimes the story gets lost in the data.

Generally, there are two places I typically go to check out recent statistics. These are The New York Times and Johns Hopkins University.

Recently however, I stumbled upon a site which examines data on COVID-19 and consumer behavior. The referenced survey was administered in mid March.

Take a look at the below charts. (These are similar to the ones from the site but have been remade in Excel.) As you look at them, see if you can spot some areas for improvement.

Chart about fears concerning the coronavirus outbreak.
Data source & graph inspiration from Astound commerce; figures remade from data
Note. Survey administered in March 11-13, 2020
Chart showing predictions on when shoppers feel COVID-19 will be under control or eradicated.
Data source & graph inspiration from Astound commerce; figures remade from data
Note. Survey administered in March 11-13, 2020
Chart showing how many people have altered their day-to-day activities in order to be as "contactless" due to COVID-19.
Data source & graph inspiration from Astound commerce; figures remade from data
Note. Survey administered in March 11-13, 2020

There is a lot to take in. Like, a LOT. These figures are pretty overwhelming.

Before I get into it, let me be clear: it is not my intention to trash talk the folks who created this. I am sure they worked really hard on it and that it took them a ton of time. Not to mention that they are working on top of the stress of COVID-19, childcare issues and job security. We are all in this together. I’m simply looking at this as data and thinking of ways to make it easier for readers to understand the story.

What these charts do right

The percentages are right there on the chart and I like the use of icons. Focusing on consumers is an interesting reference point. I haven’t seen this side of the COVID-19 story before, which is why I thought it would be interesting to highlight in our blog. Overall this chart succeeds at drawing in the reader, but at that point things get murky.

What’s missing?

The use of different types of charts is confusing and might lead the reader to think we’re looking at different types of data, or data in a different way. Really, I think the graphic designer was trying to create visual interest by breaking things up a bit, which is admirable, but not at the cost of easy interpretation. Additionally, the colors used throughout are really similar and readers must carefully search the legend over and over.

We ended up with some questions. What are the key takeaways? What are we really comparing? What is that wheel shape? And why are the hands floating?? These are not questions that you want your readers to be asking themselves, because in all likelihood, they will just walk away.

Let’s Do a Makeover!

Let’s start with the donut chart and the bar chart.

Chart about fears concerning the coronavirus outbreak.
Data source & graph inspiration from Astound commerce; figures remade from data
Note. Survey administered in March 11-13, 2020

Here are some ways I came up with to make the story pop a little bit more.

Change to a Lollipop Chart & Add Icons

First, I redid the donut charts – which are not a great substitute for a bar graph – and used my favorite chart type: a lollipop chart. I added images of each country/region for some flair and to make it easier to see which country was which. Now readers can more easily find the story behind the data. It is easier to see that respondents from the Middle East expressed greater fears concerning COVID-19 than did survey respondents in other countries.

Add a Graphic

Andrea edited this to include a graphic (a scared face) because we planned to use the chart again, and she wanted to make sure the two charts were distinctly different at-a-glance. I think you could leave out the graphic out though.

I also made the chart title more informative. I gave a short statement of what I felt was the main message of the chart. Then I added some subtext. Readers should get enough information from the title to be able to easily interpret the chart.

Middle East Citizens Report Highest Fear of COVID-19. Collectively, three quarters of all people surveyed had fears concerning COVID-19. Fears were similar for the US, Canada, and Europe, but much higher among those surveyed in the Middle East.

Reworked chart showing that Middle East citizens reported the highest level of fear of COVID-19.
Data source Astound commerce survey – March 11-13, 2020

Let’s take a look at the second chart with the floating hands. We could do another lollipop chart. The use of the same chart type informs the readers we are looking at similar types of data and it invites them in to make comparisons. I bet that the story will pop here for you, even without a helpful title.

Before:

Chart showing how many people have altered their day-to-day activities in order to be as "contactless" due to COVID-19.
[Before makeover] Data source: Astound commerce survey – March 11-13, 2020

and here’s the after:

Middle East Citizens Report Largest Behavior Changes Due to COVID-19. Around half of people surveyed in the US, Canada and Europe had altered behaviors, but over 80% of those in the Middle East had made changes.

Reworked chart showing that Middle East citizens reported the largest level of behavior changes due to COVID-19.
[After makeover] Data source: Astound commerce survey – March 11-13, 2020

Let’s get back to that busy bar chart.

Before:

Chart showing predictions on when shoppers feel COVID-19 will be under control or eradicated.
Data source Astound commerce survey – March 11-13, 2020

What makes this difficult to interpret?

The response options are included as a bar within the chart, making it difficult to read. It took me a while to even notice the survey questions, probably because the text is insanely small, making it difficult to read (particularly when you have old eyes and got up at 5:30 AM to get some work done before the kids wake up and chaos ensues… but maybe that is just me!).

It is also difficult to know what we are supposed to compare. Are we interested in comparisons across country? Are we interested when participants think COVID-19 will be under control? Do responses within country and across survey options add up to 100? All of these questions are difficult to answer.

Slider chart!

For this chart, I am going to use a slider chart (which is basically two lollipop charts combined). This makeover was a bit more complicated, but I think it tells a better story. First, I combined categories such that we now only report “within 1-2 months” and “6 months or more” (combining 6 months, one year and over a year). I felt like these two categories were more meaningful than looking at each one separately. I then created the two lollipop charts, added text boxes for labels and added my icons.

Color!

I selected the two tones from the green color family since the data were depicting participants’ likelihood to spend money. The main point is that we want two different tones in the same color family so people can distinguish them. I chose a deeper color for the “a year or more” category because that response was more intense.

Now the story is much more clear.

Now we can clearly see that most survey participants believe COVID-19 will be under control within 6 months. As always, a descriptive title helps.

Across regions, half of participants felt that COVID-19 would be under control in 6 months or more. Only one-third of participants across regions felt that COVID-19 would be under control in just a couple of months.

Reworked chart showing when citizens of varying countries think COVID-19 will be eradicated.
Data source Astound commerce survey – March 11-13, 2020

As a business owner, I would find this information helpful. I could mentally prepare for customers to not feel comfortable coming back to my business until 6 months at the earliest (but maybe more). This information might help me plan what to do to pivot my work for the next 6 months to keep things afloat until our economy starts to normalize. Obviously, opinions may have changed since the time this survey was administered, but it probably still gives business owners a good ballpark.

Regardless, this story got lost in the jumble of infographics. I’m sure there are other stories buried in the data, but that is what is fun about creating data visualizations. Sometimes you do not know the full story until you see it.

What are some key takeaways?

  1. Multiple pie charts (and their cousin, the donut chart) are difficult to interpret, and it is usually best to represent the data differently.
  2. Make data visualizations clean and not too busy. Use white space, and make sure the reader can walk away from your visualization understanding the information without having to read a full report.
  3. If presenting several visualizations together, make sure the images/graphics/colors all work well together and tell a consistent story.
  4. Use icons and images to draw interest and help the reader interpret the graph.
  5. Add a descriptive title.

Chart Makeover: Line/Area to Hybrid Graph

by Andrea Hutson

The New York Times is one of the best places to look for good data visualization design. Some of their visualizations are truly mind blowing and thought-provoking, like this text analysis of presidential candidate song preference during their rallies (back when rallies were still allowed, and there were many more presidential candiates).

But sometimes, they miss the mark a bit.  Take the graph below. The headline reads “U.S. Jobless Claims Soared to a Stunning 6.6 Million Last Week.”

Graph courtesy of The New York Times, April 2, 2020

This graph isn’t terrible, but it’s not great either. Three things I dislike:

  • Grey bar in the middle – I get that it’s supposed to indicate when the recession took place, but there’s something that feels really off about it.
  • Lots of irrelevant data in the middle – again, it’s there to show the general trend over time, but there’s just too much of it.
  • The relevant data is squished WAY over to the side.  This is the main issue — we’ve got so much data, that the real story gets lost. And the orange color isn’t helping, either.

COVID-19 Job Losses 10x Greater Than the 2008 Recession

How could we better display these data? Let’s try a hybrid graph.

Source: The New York Times, April 2020

Just to keep things simple, I used the left side of the initial NYT graph, and added on to the right side. Instead of just having one skinny line to represent the jobless claims of today, I added a large bar to show the new data. The large, red bar draws the eye to the important information, and the change in style also makes it clear that there’s been some sort of break here.

Then I added arrows, descriptions, and labels.  The graph still isn’t perfect, but I think it’s better, and, importantly, it tells the story more clearly. And it wasn’t hard to do. With my reuse of the left side of the graph, and a very simple bar, this makeover in EXCEL and Word took less than 5 minutes.

Making the graph above, I realized that there was another big story buried here. I looked up some jobs data, and found that, in Feburary 2020, there were 129.73 million full-time employees in the United States. I realized that the job losses from last week were huge considering that fact, so I thought about how to best visualize it. Here’s what I came up with:

Many Americans Have Lost Their Jobs In the Past Two Weeks

Source: The New York Times, April 2, 2020

I made this graph using a super-fancy proprietary software that I will be happy to sell to you for $199 per month.

Just kidding, y’all – I made this in PowerPoint.

Far from being sophisticated, these are just icons that I copy-pasted onto the screen a few dozen times.  Add a couple text boxes, and it’s a pretty nice looking graph.  Definitely better than a plain bar chart. Importantly, both graphs use the same information from the New York Times article, but tell distinct, and sobering stories.